by Alec Ash
In 1902, Liang Qichao, a reformist intellectual of the late Qing dynasty, wrote a futuristic story called A Chronicle of the Future of New China.Â In the unfinished manuscript, he depicts Shanghai hosting the World Fair in 1962 (“Confucius year 2513”), on the 50th anniversary of a successful reform movement.
By then, he imagines, China has developed a multi-party system and dominates a peaceful new world order in which Westerners study Chinese to improve their job prospects. This vision of a modern, technologically triumphant China would prove prescient â€“Â except for the multi-party system and peaceful world order â€“Â in 2010, when the Shanghai World Expo impressed visitors with its slick graphics, high-tech gadgets and other emblems of modernisation. Liang’s optimism for China’s rejuvenation was vindicated, only 50 years later than he thought.
Liang’s intention was not to predict the future, however, but to change the present. The message, if it reached those in power, fell on deaf ears, and the Qing court continued to reject Western science and democracy.
With his mentor, the liberal Confucian scholar Kang Youwei, and under the auspices of the young Guangxu emperor, Liang had spearheaded the Hundred Days’ Reform of 1898, which ended with a coup d’etat by the 63-year-old empress dowager Cixi, who stymied further attempts at reform until her death in 1908. Liang and Kang fled to Japan, which was rapidly modernising during the Meiji Restoration and importing ideas and literature from overseas.
It was here that Liang came across the science fiction of Jules Verne, in Japanese by way of English from the original French, and translated it into classical Chinese, starting with the anti-slavery novel A Captain at Fifteen.
Liberal intellectuals from China in that era often studied in Japan, as if China could modernise by osmosis.
Jazzing up scienceÂ
In 1901, Kang published his own speculative work, The Book of Great Unity,Â delineating a future in which states, rulers and conflict have been eliminated (women, less lucky, replenish the population by giving birth while calming music is played for them). Another young writer studying in Japan was Zhou Shuren, or Lu Xun, sometimes described as the father of modern vernacular Chinese literature, who translated other Verne novels, including Journey to the CentreÂ of the Earth.
These translations and original works were meant to further the cause of Chinese reform, by educating the populace so that they might reject old customs and superstitions, such as ancestor worship, and embrace modern science. In the 1903 preface to his translation of Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon,Â Lu wrote: “The typical reader is bored by the tediousness of science books and cannot finish them. But when dressed up in the form of fiction, the science can seep into readers’ minds without boring them. …As the reader’s heart is touched, the reader gains insight and wisdom without taxing the mind, knowledge that would break down legacy superstitions, improve their thoughts and supplement our culture. What a powerful tool is such fiction!”
“The progress of the Chinese people,” Lu declared, 15 years before his own first satirical stories were published, “begins with science fiction”.
Throughout the early 20th century, Chinese science fiction authors took advantage of the genre’s possibilities for social criticism.
In 1932, Lao She attacked the weakness and divisions of republic-era China in Cat Country,Â a novel set on the surface of Mars, where a catlike people are addicted to opiate “reverie” leaves and turn to a new ideology called “Everybody Shareskyism” â€“Â a thinly veiled stand-in for communism. China’s real Shareskyists didn’t share Lao’s sense of humour, and for decades after the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949, sci-fi was either suppressed or moulded intoÂ communist propaganda. (A typical work from 1958, Capriccio for Communism,Â depicts anniversary celebrations on Tiananmen Square in 1979 as a parade of scientific and national accomplishments.)
A new renaissance
The genre bloomed in the late 1970s and early 1980s under Deng Xiaoping’s early reforms, with experimental works such as Little Smart Roaming the FutureÂ by Ye Yonglie, before it again fell out of favour as a foreign-influenced indulgence in the Campaign Against Spiritual Pollution of 1982. It then suffered from the same suppression of free expression that affected all literature in China following the killings near Tiananmen Square in 1989.
China today meets many of the measures of progress its earlier science fiction writers imagined. The nation is stronger and richer than it has been since the Ming dynasty. Its populace is literate and largely educated. It is at peace and has the military might to defend itself. Above all, after decades of sclerosis and decades more of chaos, it now has the infrastructure and scientific capability of many developed countries.
But a new renaissance of Chinese science fiction, which began in the 1990s and found its stride in the mid-2000s, is asking whether that development is benign and equitable and what social problems it has created.
If the science fiction of a century ago was preoccupied with utopian dreams of progress, this new wave, made up mostly of younger writers, is more concerned with the rifts that have been opened in China’s social fabric now that such progress has been achieved.
The question then was how China could become rich and strong; the question today is what to do now that it is. Earlier generations of Chinese sci-fi authors had been raised on Soviet works. This one is influenced instead by such Western authors as Arthur C. Clarke and Isaac Asimov, and by the work of the “New Wave” in the 1960s and 1970s â€“Â with authors such as Ursula K. Le Guin and J.G. Ballard â€“Â which pioneered “soft” sci-fi, known for its social themes as opposed to technically oriented “hard” sci-fi.
The new sci-fi is now in many respects the most biting mode of social and political commentary in China. Long derided and marginalised by China’s literary establishment, it has slipped past the censors who so stringently watch realist fiction.
And while much of the genre remains escapist entertainment for the nation’s surplus of engineering students, its more literary practitioners have reclaimed its place at the vanguard of China’s national introspection. They are using it as a Trojan horse to sneak in truths obliquely, offering not feel-good bromides but twisted visions of what modern China has become.
This new breed of Chinese science fiction forms the core of two recent anthologies, Invisible PlanetsÂ and Touchable Unreality,Â which add to the small but growing list of works available in English. Its writers belong to a generation that grew up in a resurgent China still finding its place in the world and suffering from uneven growth and social fragmentation.
They are what Han Song â€“Â the author of bleak sci-fi fables that his fellow writer Fei Dao refers to as “gloomy China” â€“Â calls the “torn generation”, straddling the transition that China is still undergoing from poor to rich and rural to urban.
“In this era, when a new breed of humanity is coming into being,” Han writes, “China is being ripped apart at an accelerated pace.”
Liu Cixin and Wang Jiankang are two of the “three generals” of Chinese science fiction, along with Han, whose day job is covering politics for the state-owned news service Xinhua.
All three have been writing since the 1980s. (Sometimes a fourth, He Xi, is added, to make it the “four big names”.) The genre received wider recognition in China and abroad with the critical and commercial success in the mid-2000s of Liu’s trilogy, Remembrance of Earth’s Past,Â commonly known as the “Three-Body Trilogy”. Some 4 million copies have been sold, a long-delayed film is set to follow next year, and in Beijing a group of sci-fi writers and I saw a theatrical adaptation, with floating orbs and futuristic special effects. The books were translated into English starting in 2014, and the first volume (The Three-Body Problem) won a 2015 Hugo Award for best science fiction novel.
While the plot of the “Three-Body Trilogy” sounds like that of a B-movie â€“Â Earth prepares for invasion by aliens fleeing a doomed planet that orbits three suns â€“Â it begins not in the future but in the past. During the Cultural Revolution, the astrophysicist Ye Wenjie witnesses her father being beaten to death by Red Guards.
She later broadcasts Earth’s location to the hostile Trisolarans when their signal first comes through, declaring humanity a failure in need of outside intervention. Liu, who spent most of his career as an engineer at a power plant, is ultimately more interested in exploring humanity’s place in the universe than he is in reckoning with China’s historical ghosts. Yet this indictment of a time he is old enough to remember would surely not have made it into a work of realist fiction published in China.
Published in the aftermath of Liu’s success, Invisible PlanetsÂ is compiled and translated by Ken Liu, the translator of two volumes of the “Three-Body Trilogy”. The collection features two stories by Liu CixinÂ â€“Â one adapted from the novels, and another in which he satirises China’s culture of filial piety by inventing a decrepit god species that requires the support of humans in its old age.
Ken Liu is himself a prolific sci-fi author, currently completing a trilogy of what he calls “silkpunk” novels set in ancient China. In his introduction to the anthology, he warns us not to interpret Chinese sci-fi too literally, lest we “see it through the lens of Western dreams and hopes and fairytales about Chinese politics”.
Many of the stories pose questions about the place of technology and artificial intelligence in modern life, or about the divisions within societies around the world. Yet like their ancestors of a century ago, others are also clear and critical commentaries on the environments that produced them.
One such story to receive widespread attention, and a Hugo Award in 2016, is Folding BeijingÂ by Hao Jingfang. Hao, who is in her early 30s, studied physics and economics at Tsinghua University, and now works at a macroeconomics think tank. In her imagined projection of Beijing, three iterations of the capital, occupied by three separate social strata, have been engineered to fold in on themselves like a Rubik’s Cube so that the next “space” can unfurl for its apportioned time above the earth’s surface.
“First Space” is constructed for 5 million elites, who live in a leafy urban playground for every other 24-hour period from 6amÂ to 6am; “Second Space” houses the 25 million members of the literally squeezed middle class, who occupy it for the following 18 hours; and the squalor of “Third Space,” rising between 10pmÂ and 6am, is for the remaining 50 million migrant workers who process waste and perform other services for the privileged inhabitants of the city they built.
The story follows Lao Dao, a Third Spacer who smuggles himself into the opulence of First Space to deliver a message. Its social themes were not lost on its readers, whose discussions online in bulletin board (“tieba”) forums and social media threads were later deleted.
Shortly to be turned into a movie, Folding BeijingÂ became eerily relevant at the end of 2017, when the Beijing government evicted thousands of migrant workers from the outskirts of the capital in order to keep their numbers within quota, under the guise of fire safety. In another case of life imitating art, Hao told me she wrote the story to scrutinise what she called “big city disease”, a term that has now been used by China’s State Council to justify its program of limiting the migrant population in large cities.
Invisible Planets,Â also by Hao and the story that lends its name to the anthology, is a galactic homage to Italo Calvino. Her narrator tells tall tales of far-flung planets to a captive listener. There is Pimaceh, torn by conflicting and untrustworthy versions of its history; Yanyanni, where the population grows taller every year until the old physically can’t bend low enough to communicate with the young (the generation gap is a recurring motif for Hao); Lutikawulu, where genetics restrict families to evolutionarily optimised roles, making social mobility impossible; and Chincato, where the air is so dense that no light can penetrate it and inhabitants live in darkness, constantly chattering to tell each other where they are.
These descriptions might seem to refer distinctly to aspects of Chinese society, but the narrator resists her interlocutor’s attempts to understand what it all means: “The real key isn’t about whether what I say is true, but whether you believe it. From start to end, the direction of narrative is not guided by the tongue, but by the earÂ … The planets I speak of are scattered at every corner of the universe, but sometimes collect themselves into the same place as though they have always been together.”
Just as Calvino’s fantastical cities were all different refractions of Venice, Hao’s planets are entirely distinct from, and nothing but, her homeland.
In his book Celestial EmpireÂ (2017), the scholar Nathaniel Isaacson called Chinese science fiction “a vehicle for expressing anxieties and hopes for modernisation and globalisation”.Â
China’s urban transformation and vertiginous growth have bifurcated society: some live in a rich, privileged world of comfort, cashless payment, facial-recognition software and high-speed trains; others suffer quietly, building that world. Realist literature often can’t keep up with the pace of the change that China is undergoing. Fictions set in the future are not only safer from censorship but also especially good opportunities to comment on such a hurtling present.
In Ma Boyong’s story The City of Silence,Â the year is 2046, and almost all social interaction takes place online through an ever-diminishing “list of healthy words”. Instead of censoring filtered keywords, the “Department of Propaganda” restricts speech to a permitted vocabulary, so as to prevent the cheat â€“Â familiar to any Chinese web userÂ â€“Â of writing about “‘polit/cs,’ ‘ć”żitics,’ ‘pol/itic$’, and so on”. A technician who gives himself the pseudonym Wang Er (taken from the dissident novels of Wang Xiaobo) stumbles across an illegal “Talking Club” shielded from the pricked ear of the regime.
The homage to George Orwell’s 1984Â is made all too obvious when each Talking Club session concludes with someone reading aloud from 1984.
The scene is saved when Wang Er discovers that their acts of verbal rebellion are consummated in sexual rebellion: club members disperse into adjacent rooms and go at it in the name of freedom. The story was originally published in 2005 in Science Fiction World, a popular magazine, but was set in New York to obfuscate the point about Chinese censorship. The author later reverted the setting, in this translation, to simply “the Capital of the State”.
It is no surprise that covert or coded modes of communication recur within a genre that might itself qualify as such.
Ether,Â by Zhang Ran, is the first story in the bilingual collection “Touchable Unreality”, a Chinese coproduction with Clarkesworld magazine that is currently only published in China (its title in Chinese, which translates to “Mirror Image of the Future”, is more literal and less pretentious).
In Zhang’s story, dissidents rebel against a police state by tracing Chinese characters onto one another’s palms, eventually leading to a peaceful demonstration on a central city square where protesters stand in a circle and hold hands to communicate silently. In her novel Death Fugue,Â which also has sci-fi elements, the young writer Sheng Keyi refers more directly to 1989 with a fictional protest in which the famous Goddess of Democracy statue is a tower of excrement. The protesters are imprisoned in both cases. In City of SilenceÂ words are added to the blacklist until all language is forbidden.
The new wave of sci-fi is not all bleak â€“Â many stories offer optimistic visions of technological solutions to China’s problems. And China’s censors seem more keen to co-opt sci-fi than to repress it. This was made clear in November at the eighth Chinese Nebula Awards, a spangled, televised event that mimics its longer-running Western equivalent. In his opening speech, written in collaboration with the organisers, the writer Chen Qiufan talked about the imperative of Chinese science fiction to “grasp what General Secretary Xi [Jinping] has put forward, and advance the establishment of the power of the international spread of the culture of socialism with Chinese characteristics, in order to tell the China story”.
(The apparatchik syntax is as origami-like in the original.) Various officials and academics proceeded to show off China’s technological prowess, with such questionable delights as an artificial intelligence program that can tell how beautiful you are.
Modern socialist nation
Chen’s own science fiction, which appears in both anthologies, concentrates on technology (he used to work for Google in China, and is now at a virtual reality firm) but displays the same iconoclastic social commentary characteristic of his generation.
In Coming of the Light,Â a start-up company seeks a Buddhist master to bless its app, while a gullible clientele claims magical effects. The Year of the RatÂ solves youth unemployment and militarism by putting graduates to work hunting mutant rats. Smog SocietyÂ explores the connection between air pollution and depression, while The Mao GhostÂ uses the word for “cat”, a homonym of Chairman Mao Zedong’s surname, to sneak in forbidden references to the death toll of the Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward.
In his novel The Waste Tide, not yet published in English, Chen pits capitalism against its victims on an island dedicated to the processing of electronic waste that is modelled on the real e-waste town of Guiyu in southern China.
“This is a future,” as Han described the book, “that will make a young person feel the death of idealism.” Han himselfÂ â€“Â winner of the 2017 Chinese Nebula AwardÂ â€“Â is no less grim. His story Security CheckÂ in Touchable UnrealityÂ parodies China’s ubiquitous subway security scans, a symbol of the nanny state, which he imagines intensifying ad absurdum; while in Finished,Â an unfeeling boss traps a worker in a Kafkaesque argument about why he cannot get paid for his labor.
It is with such wry deflection of the depressing into the surreal and the rejection of lofty ideals for a shrug and a wink that much of China’s new science fiction diagnoses its times.
“Faced with the absurd reality of contemporary China,” Chen observes, “the writer cannot fully explore or express the possibilities of extreme beauty and extreme ugliness without resorting to science fiction.”
Xia Jia, who contributes stories to both anthologies and received the first doctorate for the study of Chinese sci-fi, writes in one of the three essays that close Invisible PlanetsÂ that Chinese science fiction writers encompass a range of attitudes: “Some are pessimistic, believing that we’re powerless against irresistible trends; some are hopeful that human ingenuity will ultimately triumph; still others resort to ironic observation of the absurdities of life.”
In the 1910 story New ChinaÂ by Lu Shi’e, the narrator awakens in 1950 to find China strong, rich and kind to its people (“practically socialism already, and so of course we’re not plagued by Communists”).
As the nation reckons with the human price of its accelerated modernisation, today’s science fiction is more divided about China’s prospects for 2050, the date by which President Xi Jinping wants it to become a “great modern socialist country”. At the very least, this new generation of Chinese sci-fi authors questions whether development alone, without a humane society and consideration for those whose rights have been trampled over in the name of that advance, is enough for the future of the new China.
New York Review of Books
“Invisible Planets: Contemporary Chinese Science Fiction in Translation”, translated from the Chinese and edited by Ken Liu, Tor Books.
“Touchable Unreality”, edited by Neil Clarke, Wyrm press. Alec Ash is a writer and editor based in Beijing. He is the author of “Wish Lanterns,” about China’s youth.
Â© 2018 The New York Review of Books distributed by the New York Times Syndicate.